title


ROOF FRAME STRUCTURE

The usu-bari, the bottom members of the roof truss frames, are spaced regularly at I ken (around 1.8-meter) intervals, resting on top of the horizontal girders and beams of the body frame. After the usu-bari are set in place, the other truss members are added to complete the frame. The connection between the sloped truss rafter and the usu-bari is a type of pin connec-tion, with the bottom ends of the truss rafters carved into a pointed shape and inserted into slots in the top of the usu-bari, and the top ends of the truss rafters are lashed together with mansaku (Japanese witch hazel). The slope is quite steep, almost 60 degrees in most houses that remain today -- but researchers have learned that the roof slopes in earlier periods were not quite so steep, and that over time the angle of the slope has gradually increased; thus the older the house, the less steep is the angle of the slope.

For attachment of the roofing material, horizontal wooden members are secured across the top of the sloped truss rafters, and another layer of smaller sloped members is placed across these horizontals; straw mats are then fastened on top to serve as the base plane to support the thatching material (Fig.2-3, 4, 5).

To reinforce the overall structure, compensating for the inherent weakness of this type of frame against lateral forces acting on the gable end, diagonal bracing members (suji-kai) are used --large diagonal braces secured inside the plane of the truss rafters with smaller cross-braces fas-tened to the outside of the truss rafters (Fig.2-4). This type of diagonal bracing was another unique feature of the Gassho-style.

As described above. the usu-bari simply rests on top of the girders and beams, with only small dowel pins to prevent them from slipping out of place, and is not structurally connected to it; therefore the forces which are transferred from the roof structure to the body frame are not torsional forces but simple vertical loads. Also, the adoption of a thin member to use as the usu-bari is quite logical, since this member functions only in tension, with no compression forces, and there is no need here for a thick, heavy beam (Fig.2-2, Fig.3).

These points, as well as the adoption of a pin connection between the usu-bari and the truss rafter, show that the Gassho-style house is indeed an unusually rational structure, one which demonstrates that the people in this area clearly understood the principles of structural dynamics. This type of structure is very rare in Japan, and it is appropriate to say that the Gassho-style house represents the most advanced development of structural method in Japanese architecture.

There are other important characteristics of the Gassho-style roof structure which differ from those of ordinary Japanese farmhouses. The most typical farmhouse roof types are hipped or hipped-gable thatch roofs, with gable-roofed houses in the minority (Fig.5-1,2,3, Fig.6-1). In cases where the gable roof ~ adopted, however, truss structures are not common; to resist external horizontal forces in the direction of the longitudinal axis, the typical roof structure uses short vertical posts, connected and stiffened by horizontal penetration bracing. In such cases the roof slope is quite low, usually less than 20 degrees, and the roofing material is not thatch but wooden boards (Fig.6-2). Thus the particular combination of features which make up the Gassho-style -- the adoption of a truss structure for a thatched, steeply-sloped gable roof -- makes this style unique.

One of the reasons that the truss structure was adopted was to make the roof slope as steep as possible to help shed snow, a practical defense against the unusually heavy snowfall. Also, there was a need to increase the volume of interior space inside the roof structure -- fully open space unobstructed by internal posts and beams -- to make the interior spatial volume of the roof structure usable as an active functional space; this was very unusual in Japan, where most farmhouse attics were either unused or used only for passive functions such as storage. Compared to the roughly 60-degree slope of the Gassho-style roof, other generic thatched-roof houses had slopes of 45 degrees or less, too low to provide adequate open volume inside.

To provide the necessary usable area inside the attic, bamboo-slat flooring or wooden-board flooring is installed on top of the usu-bari and one or more layers of floor-support joists (called gassho-bari) are added to divide the triangular volume into two or three levels (up to four levels in the largest houses) for maximum utilization of the available space. The ends of the gassho-bari are inserted into and lashed to the sloping truss rafters, and bamboo or board flooring spans from joist to joist.

The adoption of the gable style instead of the more typical hipped-gable style, in spite of the usual inherent weakness of the gable type, was primarily due to the need for adequate lighting and ventilation in the functional attic space. These attic levels were used primarily for the raising of silkworms, but were sometimes used as storage spaces for mulberry leaves (Fig.4). To make the space habitable, several large shoji-paneled window openings were provided in the gable end wall for air circulation and natural lighting. The exterior of the gable end wall is surfaced with wood siding; in Shirakawa-go the end wall inclines outward toward the top, but in the Gokayama area this wall is vertical.

The combination of this particular structural system and roof type has resulted in another characteristic which sets the Gassho-style house apart from the typical Japanese farmhouse: unlike the common image of a low-profile house form which rests comfortably on the earth, suggesting not confrontation with nature but rather passive harmony with it (Fig.5-1,2,3), the Gassho-style house is an unusually tall, impressively large-scaled form which projects a strong image of "confrontation" or "confident resistance" against the harshness of nature (Fig. 1-1,2).

JAPAN:SHIRAKAWA-GO/GOKAYAMA


link-button